ICT trends, read as a knowledge graph
When nearly every publication carries AI, counting them tells you nothing. So we look at what arrives together with what. The material is published by Korea's IITP, and we state the sample size and what we could not classify.
IITP · 2021.10 ~ 2026.09 · 558 items
The overview tab shows aggregates only. Pick a year to see the publications — putting all 558 on one page makes it far too heavy.
Source
Published by 정보통신기획평가원 (IITP)
- Obtained via
- 공공데이터포털 15036878 (등록기관 한국연구재단)
- Terms of use
- 이용허락범위 제한 없음 (공공누리 유형 미표기)
- Updated
- 2026.09.30
558
Publications collected
254
With an outline
558
Source links
240
Without a topic
An outline is the issue list printed at the front of a publication, not the full text. We do not host the documents; we link to the publisher instead.
“Source links” adds the 206 items that carry a PDF URL to the 352 we open on the publisher's detail page.
① Topic relations
What comes with what
A publication carries several topics at once. The lines are how often two topics appeared together; circle size is how many items carry that topic.
What changed recently
Newly linked
AI · 인프라·데이터센터
from none to 12 items, 11.1%
인프라·데이터센터 · 반도체
from none to 9 items, 8.3%
데이터 · 인프라·데이터센터
from none to 8 items, 7.4%
데이터 · 양자
from none to 7 items, 6.5%
양자 · 보안
from none to 6 items, 5.6%
Grown in share
AI · 반도체
18 items 20.7% → 39 items 36.1%
AI · 양자
3 items 3.4% → 16 items 14.8%
AI · 데이터
18 items 20.7% → 34 items 31.5%
데이터 · 반도체
5 items 5.7% → 16 items 14.8%
AI · 인재
2 items 2.3% → 12 items 11.1%
ⓘ Only quarters classified above 50% are compared. The earlier window is 24Q1~25Q2 (87 classified); the recent one is 25Q3~26Q3 (108 classified).
ⓘ We compare shares of the items classified in each window, not raw counts. Raw counts cannot tell a new relation apart from more classification.
ⓘ Only the 12 most frequent pairs are drawn; the cut-off is 20 items. Drawing them all turns the picture into a hairball.
ⓘ Each list shows at most 5 entries, largest change first.
ⓘ We do not list what fell. The differences were one or two items — sampling noise, not a trend.
① Topic flow
How many items each topic carried
One bar is one quarter, the rightmost being the latest. The number on the right is the total for the whole window.
⚠️ The bars count only what carries a topic. Earlier quarters have been gone through less, so a low bar there does not mean the topic was absent. Each quarter shows how much of it is classified, and quarters below 50% are hatched.
AI
2328
3
5
6
4
8
6
7
12
14
13
11
2
12
20
21
25
18
18
19
21Q422Q122Q222Q322Q423Q123Q223Q323Q424Q124Q224Q324Q425Q125Q225Q325Q426Q126Q226Q3232반도체
1266
7
8
12
6
7
4
5
6
5
5
4
1
6
3
13
9
7
8
4
21Q422Q122Q222Q322Q423Q123Q223Q323Q424Q124Q224Q324Q425Q125Q225Q325Q426Q126Q226Q3126데이터
977
2
9
5
3
2
2
5
6
3
7
8
1
1
1
8
16
4
5
2
21Q422Q122Q222Q322Q423Q123Q223Q323Q424Q124Q224Q324Q425Q125Q225Q325Q426Q126Q226Q397플랫폼
616
3
6
2
6
0
4
3
3
6
3
2
0
0
1
5
3
5
3
0
21Q422Q122Q222Q322Q423Q123Q223Q323Q424Q124Q224Q324Q425Q125Q225Q325Q426Q126Q226Q361보안
542
1
5
3
1
1
3
2
6
2
4
2
0
1
2
4
6
3
3
3
21Q422Q122Q222Q322Q423Q123Q223Q323Q424Q124Q224Q324Q425Q125Q225Q325Q426Q126Q226Q354양자
422
0
2
4
1
5
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
4
5
4
4
2
2
4
21Q422Q122Q222Q322Q423Q123Q223Q323Q424Q124Q224Q324Q425Q125Q225Q325Q426Q126Q226Q342로봇
322
1
0
1
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
1
4
2
4
0
6
21Q422Q122Q222Q322Q423Q123Q223Q323Q424Q124Q224Q324Q425Q125Q225Q325Q426Q126Q226Q332인재
271
0
2
4
1
1
0
0
3
1
1
1
0
0
0
3
6
2
1
0
21Q422Q122Q222Q322Q423Q123Q223Q323Q424Q124Q224Q324Q425Q125Q225Q325Q426Q126Q226Q327인프라·데이터센터
120
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
4
2
3
0
21Q422Q122Q222Q322Q423Q123Q223Q323Q424Q124Q224Q324Q425Q125Q225Q325Q426Q126Q226Q312공급망·수출통제
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
21Q422Q122Q222Q322Q423Q123Q223Q323Q424Q124Q224Q324Q425Q125Q225Q325Q426Q126Q226Q33
ⓘ Each quarter holds 27.9 items on average. The sample is small, so read the movement between quarters as a direction, not a measurement.
②
Rising topics
- 로봇26Q2 0 → 26Q3 6
- 양자26Q2 2 → 26Q3 4
- AI26Q2 18 → 26Q3 19
ⓘ This shows how often the publisher wrote about a topic. It does not say the market grew. The latest quarter is also still in progress, so the comparison is early.
③
Terms seen for the first time
- 시가총액26Q3
- 오픈웨이트26Q3
- WAIC26Q3
- WRC26Q3
- FBI26Q3
- 유럽혁신법26Q3
- HOT26Q3
- 칩에서26Q3
- 무형자산26Q3
- 모델규제26Q3
- 대미26Q3
- 기가팩토리26Q3
- SCIENTIST26Q3
ⓘ Terms that first appeared in the quarter shown. They are not yet settled topics.
④ No topic attached
240 items- Source gave us nothing197The title is only the series name and issue number, and no outline arrived.
- Outside the dictionary43There is something to go on, but our topic dictionary does not know the term.
Show the 43 outside the dictionary
- 25Q4글로벌 산업정책 자동 분류 방법에 관한 소고 [주간기술동향 2193호]
- 25Q1차세대 6G 네트워크를 위한 위성 간 통신 기술 동향 [주간기술동향 2168호]
- 25Q1대규모 안테나 시스템에서의 ISAC 지원을 위한 빔포밍 기술 [주간기술동향 2167호]
- 25Q16G와 위성 통신의 융합: 글로벌 연결성의 새로운 패러다임 [주간기술동향 2166호]
- 25Q1Diving Deep : CES 2025 [ICT SPOT ISSUE(2025-02호)]
- 25Q1자율주행에서 정밀도로지도의 역할 및 전망 [주간기술동향 2164호]
- 25Q1공격표면관리 기술 동향 [주간기술동향 2162호]
- 25Q12025년 ICT 10대 이슈 (발표자료)
- 25Q1‘2025 ICT 10대 이슈’ AX시대 디지털 변화의 흐름 [ICT SPOT ISSUE(2025-01호)]
- 24Q4ICT SPOT ISSUE(2024-09호) 저궤도 위성통신 시대 산업 동향과 주요 플레이어
- 24Q4ICT SPOT ISSUE(2024-10호) 공간 컴퓨팅의 부상 산업 동향과 미래를 위한 전략
- 24Q4ICT SPOT ISSUE(2024-08호) 주요국 혁신·도전형 R&D 추진 동향
- 24Q4ICT SPOT ISSUE(2024-07호) 유럽 ICT R&D 지원체계 분석 - 호라이즌 유럽 2021-2027
- 24Q4ICT SPOT ISSUE(2024-06호) 변화하는 오픈랜 패러다임과 미국의 정책 대응 방향
- 24Q2<정기간행물 통합 안내(해외정책 ICT R&D 정책동향, 월간 ICT 산업동향)>
- 23Q4해외 ICT R&D 정책동향(2023-06) EU의 디지털 시장 규제 정책 동향
- 23Q4해외 ICT R&D 정책동향(2023-04) 디지털 심화의 새로운 질서와 규범
- 23Q4해외 ICT R&D 정책동향(2023-03) 미국의 ICT 연구개발(R&D): 예산, 평가·관리 체계, 주요 프로그램
- 23Q3ICT SPOT ISSUE(2023-07호) 디지털경제 패러다임 하의 글로벌 디지털 통상·공급망 정책 분석 및 시사점
- 23Q3해외 ICT R&D 정책동향(2023-01) 디지털경제 패러다임 하의 글로벌 디지털 통상·공급망 정책 분석 및 시사점
- 23Q3ICT SPOT ISSUE (2023-05호) 빅테크 주요 개발자 회의 동향 및 시사점
- 23Q2ICT SPOT ISSUE (2023-04호) 디지털의 거대한 흐름, 디지털 금융
- 23Q1해외 ICT R&D 정책동향(2022-08) 주요국의 2023 ICT R&D 예산 분석
- 23Q1ICT Brief (2023-2호)
- 23Q1ICT Brief (2023-1호)
- 22Q4ICT Brief (2022-46호)
- 22Q4ICT Brief (2022-45호)
- 22Q4ICT Brief (2022-42호)
- 22Q4ICT Brief (2022-37호)
- 22Q3ICT Brief (2022-32호)
- 22Q3ICT Brief (2022-29호)
- 22Q2ICT Brief (2022-23호)
- 22Q2ICT Spot Issue (2022-3호) 통계그래프로 살펴본 우리나라 ICT 기업의 R&D 특징 및 시사점
- 22Q2ICT Brief (2022-13호)
- 22Q1ICT Brief (2022-11호)
- 22Q1ICT Brief (2022-08호)
- 22Q1ICT Brief (2022-01호)
- 21Q4ICT Spot Issue (2021-19호) 5G DNA 동향과 시사점
- 21Q4ICT Spot Issue (2021-18호) 주요국의 ICT 전략기술 및 투자 현황
- 21Q4ICT Brief (2021-46호)
- 21Q4ICT Spot Issue (2021-17호) 스마트 치안 D.N.A 동향과 시사점
- 21Q4ICT Brief (2021-43호)
- 21Q4ICT Brief (2021-41호)
Placed as relations, it reads differently
The same material tells a different story once you place what connects to what. Weaving scattered documents and data into something you can ask questions of is the work we do. What we wrote ourselves about ontologies and knowledge graphs is in Insights.